Subscribing Forest Carbon Sink to Fulfill the Responsibility of Ecological Environmental Restoration
-
摘要: 以认购林业碳汇的方式来替代履行生态环境修复责任，契合了我国“双碳”战略目标，并能避免当事人在履行生态环境修复责任时可能面临侵权地现实条件不允许或者个人修复能力不足等问题。当受损生态环境无法直接修复时，在符合当事人意愿的前提下，司法机关可以引导当事人通过认购经核证或经各省林业行政主管部门备案的林业碳汇的形式替代履行生态环境修复责任，以达成生态修复目的。这种替代履行应遵循认购程序，并提高社会公众参与度。为防止生态修复赔偿金被不当使用，应建立生态环境评估机制、林业碳汇认购资金管理制度，通过设立银行专项账户、明确资金使用程序对认购金进行管理，并加强对认购资金的监督，从而增强司法实践的可操作性。Abstract: The approach to fulfilling the obligation of eco-environment restoration by purchasing forest carbon sinks as the alternative aligns with China’s “dual carbon” strategy and can help address the challenges that the parties involved may face in fulfilling their restoration responsibilities due to unfavorable local conditions or limited individual capacity. When the damaged ecological environment cannot be restored on site, with the consent of the parties involved, the judicial authorities can guide the parties to fulfill their restoration obligations by purchasing forest carbon sinks that have been verified or registered with the provincial forestry authorities, so as to achieve the goal of ecological restoration. This approach should follow the designated procedures and ensure increased public participation. In order to prevent the inappropriate use of compensation funds for ecological restoration, it is necessary to establish a mechanism for ecological environment assessment and a management system for forest carbon sink subscription funds, the subscription funds will be managed by setting up a designated bank account and specifying the procedures for fund utilization, and more efforts should be taken to strengthen the supervision of the funds use, so as to enhance the enforceability of judicial practices.
-
[1] 刘超. 环境法典污染控制编空间法律制度的构建[J]. 法学论坛,2022,37(2):17 − 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8003.2022.2.fxlt202202002 [2] 宋平, 赵荣, 胡利娟, 等. 推动“双碳”目标实现的林业碳汇科学传播策略[J]. 世界林业研究,2023,36(2):89 − 94. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0002.y [3] 张辉. 我省林业碳汇损失补偿将有计量标准[N]. 福建日报, 2022-08-09(5). [4] 徐军, 李方玲. 生态环境修复责任在刑事附带环境民事公益诉讼中的司法适用研究: 以397份裁判文书为样本[J]. 四川环境,2021,40(4):238 − 243. [5] 张宝, 殷佳伟. 替代性修复责任司法适用的反思与调适[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(4):49 − 59. [6] 秦天宝, 王亚琪. 购买碳汇修复生态责任承担方式的司法适用[J]. 法律适用,2023(1):106 − 117. [7] 刘超. “双碳”目标下“认购碳汇”司法适用的规范路径[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(5):18 − 31. doi: 10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.20220927.001 [8] 庄奇桦, 刘梅娟, 蒋琦, 等. 森林碳汇会计计量模式研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2022,42(4):403 − 414. doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20220029 [9] 中国人民银行长春中心支行课题组. 碳汇交易平台建设的经验借鉴和启示[J]. 吉林金融研究,2022(12):8 − 11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3109.2022.12.003 [10] 周伯煌, 徐凌韬. 林业碳汇供给主体产权权益保障问题探析[J]. 世界林业研究,2023,36(2):127 − 131. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0013.y [11] 韦超前, 周鑫, 李云. 基于LFA-SA-FCE组合模型的替代性修复成效评估研究[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2022,47(4):76 − 80. doi: 10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.202204076 [12] 周翔, 张旭勇, 吴家根. 生态环境保护领域公益损害赔偿金使用研究: 基于检察公益诉讼视角[G]//最高人民检察院法律政策研究室. 第四届全国检察官阅读征文活动获奖文选. 北京, 2023: 200−208. DOI: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2023.004990. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 32
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
