• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵双效期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(核心库)来源期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

结构调控对人工用材林生长及生理生态过程影响研究进展

曲冠博 贾黎明

曲冠博, 贾黎明. 结构调控对人工用材林生长及生理生态过程影响研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2023, 36(4): 28-34. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0051.y
引用本文: 曲冠博, 贾黎明. 结构调控对人工用材林生长及生理生态过程影响研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2023, 36(4): 28-34. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0051.y
Guanbo Qu, Liming Jia. Effect of Structure Regulation on Growth and Physiological Ecological Process of Artificial Timber Forests[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 36(4): 28-34. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0051.y
Citation: Guanbo Qu, Liming Jia. Effect of Structure Regulation on Growth and Physiological Ecological Process of Artificial Timber Forests[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 36(4): 28-34. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0051.y

结构调控对人工用材林生长及生理生态过程影响研究进展

doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0051.y
基金项目: 宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划“宁夏沿黄城市带城市林业系统主要生态功能研究与示范”(2019BFG02024) ;“十四五”国家重点研发计划“揭榜挂帅”课题“白杨大径级工业资源材精准高效培育技术研究”(2021YFD2201203)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    曲冠博,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为用材林培育理论与技术,E-mail:1048667209@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    贾黎明,博士,教授,主要研究方向为森林培育理论与技术,E-mail:jlm@bjfu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: S718.43,S727.1

Effect of Structure Regulation on Growth and Physiological Ecological Process of Artificial Timber Forests

  • 摘要: 结构调控是人工用材林培育过程中的关键技术,主要包括通过间伐进行密度调控以及通过修枝进行树体管理。间伐与修枝作为2项重要的结构调控措施,广泛应用于人工用材林的培育与管理中,能够有效改善林分结构、促进林木生长并提高出材品质,对用材林产量与质量的提升具有重要意义。文中从冠层结构、生长、干形材质等方面综述目前国内外人工用材林结构调控的研究进展,阐述分析了结构调控在生理生态过程上的作用机理,并从间伐与修枝耦合效果、结构调控作用机理分析、结构调控模型构建等方面对未来开展人工用材林结构调控理论与技术创新进行了展望。
  • [1] 翟明普, 马履一. 森林培育学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2021.
    [2] WANG C S, TANG C, SEBASTIAN H, et al. Branch development of five-year-old Betula alnoides plantations in response to planting density[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(1). DOI: 10.3390/f9010042.
    [3] ZHAO D H, BULLOCK B P, MONTES C R, et al. Long-term dynamics of loblolly pine crown structure and aboveground net primary production as affected by site quality, planting density and cultural intensity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 472:118259. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118259.
    [4] FORRESTER D I, COLLOPY J J, BEADLE C L, et al. Interactive effects of simultaneously applied thinning, pruning and fertiliser application treatments on growth, biomass production and crown architecture in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2012, 267:104 − 116.
    [5] MUÑOZ F, RUBILAR R, ESPINOSA M, et al. The effect of pruning and thinning on above ground aerial biomass of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane & Maiden) Maiden[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(3/4):365 − 373.
    [6] PINKARD E A. Effects of pattern and severity of pruning on growth and branch development of pre-canopy closure Eucalyptus nitens[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 157(1/2/3):217 − 230.
    [7] MEDHURST J L, PINKARD E A, BEADLE C L, et al. Growth and stem form responses of plantation-grown Acacia melanoxylon (R. Br. ) to form pruning and nurse-crop thinning[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 179(1/2/3):183 − 193.
    [8] TOILLON J, FICHOT R, ERWIN D, et al. Planting density affects growth and water-use efficiency depending on site in Populus deltoides × P. nigra[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 304:345 − 354. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.017
    [9] BRAIS S, HARVEY B D, BOSE A. Stem- and stand-level growth and mortality following partial cutting in eastern boreal poplar- white spruce stands[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2018. DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0177.
    [10] MORENO-FERNÁNDEZ D, SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ M, ÁLVAREZ-GONZÁLEZ J G, et al. Response to the interaction of thinning and pruning of pine species in Mediterranean mountains[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 133(5):833 − 843. doi: 10.1007/s10342-014-0800-z
    [11] DESROCHERS A, MAURIN V, TARROUX E. Production and role of epicormic shoots in pruned hybrid poplar: effects of clone, pruning season and intensity[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2015, 72(4):425 − 434. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0443-8
    [12] WU L C, WANG B P, QIAO J, et al. Effects of trunk-extension pruning at different intensities on the growth and trunk form of Paulownia fortunei[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 327:128 − 135. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.008
    [13] 马永春, 佘诚棋, 方升佐. 不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(4):137 − 142.
    [14] 孙尚伟. 修枝对欧美杨107及林下作物生长和生理的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010.
    [15] PARK J, KIM T, MOON M, et al. Effects of thinning intensities on tree water use, growth, and resultant water use efficiency of 50-year-old Pinus koraiensis forest over four years[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 408:121 − 128. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.031
    [16] BHANDARI S K, VENEKLAAS E J, MCCAW L, et al. Effect of thinning and fertilizer on growth and allometry of Eucalyptus marginata[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 479:118594. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118594.
    [17] BOGDANOVICH E, PEREZ-PRIEGO O, EL-MADANY T S, et al. Using terrestrial laser scanning for characterizing tree structural parameters and their changes under different management in a Mediterranean open woodland[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 486:118945. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118945.
    [18] MAURIN V, DESROCHERS A. Physiological and growth responses to pruning season and intensity of hybrid poplar[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 304:399 − 406. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.039
    [19] HEVIA A, ÁLVAREZ-GONZÁLEZ J G, MAJADA J, et al. Comparison of pruning effects on tree growth, productivity and dominance of two major timber conifer species[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 374:82 − 92. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.001
    [20] 李广德, 张亚雄, 时海香, 等. 修枝对8年生三倍体毛白杨生长及生理的短期影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(2):30 − 35. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.02.005
    [21] ZHANG J, LIU L Q. Effects of pruning intensity on nonstructural carbohydrates of Populus alba × P. talassica in the arid desert region of Northwest China[J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2021, 32(2): 8. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01098-7.

    ZHANG J, LIU L Q. Effects of pruning intensity on nonstructural carbohydrates of Populus alba × P. talassica in the arid desert region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2021,32(2):8. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01098-7.
    [22] AMATEIS R L, BURKHART H E. Growth of young loblolly pine trees following pruning[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262(12):2338 − 2343. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.029
    [23] COX L E, YORK R A, BATTLES J J. Growth and form of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in a plantation spacing trial after 28years - ScienceDirect[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 488:119033. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119033.
    [24] 崔光彩. 间伐对杨树生长、林下植物多样性和土壤酶活性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2014.
    [25] MISSANJO E, KAMANGA-THOLE G, et al. Effect of first thinning and pruning on the individual growth of Pinus patula tree species[J]. 林业研究(英文版), 2015, 26(4): 827-831

    MISSANJO E, KAMANGA-THOLE G. Effect of first thinning and pruning on the individual growth of Pinus patula tree species[J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2015,26(4):827 − 831.
    [26] ZHAO D H, KANE M, BORDERS B E. Growth responses to planting density and management intensity in loblolly pine plantations in the southeastern USA Lower Coastal Plain[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2011, 68(3):625 − 635. doi: 10.1007/s13595-011-0045-7
    [27] HU J, HERBOHN J, CHAZDON R L, et al. Silvicultural treatment effects on commercial timber volume and functional composition of a selectively logged Australian tropical forest over 48 years: science direct[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 457:117690. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117690.
    [28] NEGISHI Y, ETO Y, HISHITA M, et al. Role of thinning intensity in creating mixed hardwood and conifer forests within a Cryptomeria japonica conifer plantation: a 14-year study[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 468(3):118184. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118184.
    [29] SKOVSGAARD J P, JOHANSSON U, TUNE M C, et al. Effects of thinning practice, high pruning and slash management on crop tree and stand growth in young even-aged stands of planted Silver birch (Betula pendula Roth)[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(2):225. DOI: 10.3390/f12020225.
    [30] 贾全全, 罗春旺, 刘琪璟, 等. 不同林分密度油松人工林生物量分配模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6):87 − 92.
    [31] 贾忠奎, 公宁宁, 姚凯, 等. 间伐强度对塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林生长进程和生物量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2012,40(3):5 − 7,31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2012.03.002
    [32] 闫东锋, 郭丹丹, 吴桂藏, 等. 间伐对杨树人工林表层根系分布及碳存储格局的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报,2017,32(2):30 − 36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.02.05
    [33] ZHAO D H, BULLOCK B P, MONTES C R, et al. Production, tree size inequality and growth dominance in loblolly pine plantations under different silvicultural management regimes[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 526:120594. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120594.
    [34] SOARES A, LEITE H G, CRUZ J P, et al. Development of stand structural heterogeneity and growth dominance in thinned Eucalyptus stands in Brazil[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017, 384:339 − 346. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.010
    [35] ACQUAH S B, MARSHALL P L, ESKELSON B N I, et al. Changes in size inequality and growth dominance in thinned and unthinned uneven-aged interior Douglas-fir dominated stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 524:120517. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120517.
    [36] SANG Y R, GAO P, KANG X Y, et al. Effect of initial planting density on growth traits and wood properties of triploid Chinese white poplar (Populus tometosa) plantation[J]. Forests, 2021, 12:1676. DOI: 10.3390/f12121676.
    [37] RUSSO D, MARZILIANO P A, MACRI G, et al. Does thinning intensity affect wood quality? an analysis of calabrian pine in southern Italy using a non-destructive acoustic method[J]. Forests, 2019(4). DOI: 10.3390/F10040303.
    [38] JUEL R, THOMAS N L, PETER S J. Pre-commercial thinning in naturally regenerated stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L. ): effects of thinning pattern, stand density and pruning on tree growth and stem quality[J]. Forestry, 2018(1):1 − 13.
    [39] WANG C S, ZHAO Z G, HEIN S, et al. Effect of planting density on knot attributes and branch occlusion of Betula alnoides under natural pruning in Southern China[J]. Forests, 2015, 6(12):1343 − 1361. doi: 10.3390/f6041343
    [40] 赵辉, 高立国, 郭延朋, 等. 华北落叶松人工林生长及基本材性特征对林木修枝的响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2019,47(4):29 − 32,48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2019.04.006
    [41] 张群. 人工修枝对提高杉木木材质量影响的研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2011.
    [42] HARRI M, ERKKI V, AILI T. Effects of pruning in Norway spruce on tree growth and grading of sawn boards in Finland[J]. Forestry, 2014(3):8. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpt062.
    [43] WANG C S, HEIN S, ZHAO Z G, et al. Branch occlusion and discoloration of Betula alnoides under artificial and natural pruning[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 375:200 − 210. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.027
    [44] 马天舒. 杉木无节材培育技术体系初步研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2021.
    [45] WANG S Y, LIN C J, CHIU C H. Effects of thinning and pruning on knots and lumber recovery of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides) planted in the Lu-Kuei area[J]. Journal of Wood Science, 2003, 49(5):444 − 449. doi: 10.1007/s10086-002-0495-5
    [46] LI R S, YANG Q P, ZHANG W D, et al. Thinning effect on photosynthesis depends on needle ages in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 580:900 − 906. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.036
    [47] LI R S, HAN J M, GUAN X, et al. Crown pruning and understory removal did not change the tree growth rate in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 464:118056. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118056.
    [48] QIU X C, WANG H B, PENG D L, et al. Thinning drives C: N: P stoichiometry and nutrient resorption in Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in North China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 462:117984. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117984.
    [49] 魏大平, 张健, 张丹桔, 等. 不同林冠郁闭度马尾松(Pinus massoniana)叶片养分再吸收率及其化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(3):560 − 569.
    [50] 刘西军, 黄庆丰, 徐小牛, 等. 修枝对滩地杨树生长和养分的短期影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2009,23(5):195 − 199. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2009.05.042
    [51] 林达, CHUONG D N, 洪森先, 等. 间伐对杨树人工林土壤微生物量和氮含量的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报,2016,36(4):416 − 422.
    [52] DANG P, GAO Y, LIU J L, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory vegetation and soil microbial communities of a mature Chinese pine plantation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630:171. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.197.
    [53] PISARELLO K L, SUN G E, EVANS J M, et al. Potential long term water yield impacts from pine plantation management strategies in the southeastern United States[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 522:120454. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120454.
    [54] 孙尚伟, 尹伟伦, 夏新莉, 等. 修枝对复合农林系统内小气候及作物生长的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2009,31(1):25 − 30. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2009.01.005
    [55] 燕亚飞, 方升佐, 田野, 等. 林下植物多样性及养分积累量对杨树林分结构的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2014,33(5):1170 − 1177. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20140327.053
    [56] 马履一, 李春义, 王希群, 等. 不同强度间伐对北京山区油松生长及其林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2007,43(5):1 − 9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.05.001
    [57] 于立忠, 朱教君, 孔祥文, 等. 人为干扰(间伐)对红松人工林林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2006(11):3757 − 3764. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.031
    [58] 张康, 黄开栋, 赵小军, 等. 修枝对杨树人工林林内小气候及林下植被的短期效应[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(8):1548 − 1556. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.08.007
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  44
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-06
  • 修回日期:  2023-06-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-06-29
  • 刊出日期:  2023-07-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回