• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵双效期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(核心库)来源期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

FSC森林经营联合认证标准最新修订及其对我国的影响

刘小丽 校建民 杨慧 马利超 王艳艳

刘小丽, 校建民, 杨慧, 马利超, 王艳艳. FSC森林经营联合认证标准最新修订及其对我国的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0067.y
引用本文: 刘小丽, 校建民, 杨慧, 马利超, 王艳艳. FSC森林经营联合认证标准最新修订及其对我国的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0067.y
Xiaoli Liu, Jianmin Xiao, Hui Yang, Lichao Ma, Yanyan Wang. The Latest Changes of FSC Group Certification Standard for Forest Management and Its Impact on China[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2021, 34(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0067.y
Citation: Xiaoli Liu, Jianmin Xiao, Hui Yang, Lichao Ma, Yanyan Wang. The Latest Changes of FSC Group Certification Standard for Forest Management and Its Impact on China[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2021, 34(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0067.y

FSC森林经营联合认证标准最新修订及其对我国的影响

doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2021.0067.y
基金项目: 国家林业和草原局项目“中非森林可持续经营合作研究”(500103-0175)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘小丽,女,助理研究员,博士,主要从事可持续林业管理研究,E-mail:happyrainly@163.com

    通讯作者:

    校建民,男,副研究员,博士,主要研究方向为森林可持续经营政策与标准及森林认证,E-mail:xiaojm@caf.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: F326.2, X826

The Latest Changes of FSC Group Certification Standard for Forest Management and Its Impact on China

  • 摘要: 联合认证是小规模经营者开展森林管理委员会(FSC)森林经营认证的重要组织模式。从2018年起FSC对联合认证的标准进行了重新修订,并于2021年3月16日正式生效。FSC森林经营联合认证标准的制修订对于完善中国森林认证标准体系具有参考意义。文中介绍了FSC联合认证标准的最新变动,就该标准实施后对我国已开展认证的组织可能产生的影响进行了评估分析,并就国内如何开展相关工作及应对该标准的变化提出了建议。
  • [1] FLORENTINE M, TORALF R, JOHAN B, et al. Group certification-internal control systems in organic agriculture: significance, opportunities and challenges[R/OL]. (2019-03-26) [2021-04-27]. https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/35159/7/fibl-2019-ics.pdf.
    [2] MIGLIORINI P, WEZEL A. Converging and diverging principles and practices of organic agriculture regulations and agroecology[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2017, 37:63. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-017-0472-4.
    [3] LOCONTO A, FOUILLEUX E. Politics of private regulation: ISEAL and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance[J]. Regulation & Governance, 2014, 8(2):166 − 185.
    [4] SANSALVADOR M E, BROTONS J M. How environmental certification can affect the value of organizations?: the case of Forest Stewardship Council certification[J]. International Forestry Review, 2020, 22:531 − 543. doi: 10.1505/146554820831255506
    [5] MAGUIRE-RAJPAUL V A, RAJPAUL V M, MCDERMOTT C L. Coffee certification in Brazil: compliance with social standards and its implications for social equity[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22:2015 − 2044. doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0275-z
    [6] HOANG HTN, HOSHINO S, HASHIMOTO S. Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 20:35 − 42. doi: 10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
    [7] HARADA K. Certification of a community-based forest enterprise for improving institutional management and household income: a case from southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia[J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2014, 13:47 − 64. doi: 10.1007/s11842-013-9240-8
    [8] PERERA P, VLOSKY R P. A history of forest certification[R]. Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, 2006: 71.
    [9] DOCKRY M J, ESPINOZA O. Forest certification in Bolivia: a status report and analysis of stakeholder perspectives[J]. Forest Products Journal, 2014, 64(3/4):80 − 89.
    [10] CUBBAGE F, DIAZ D, YAPURA P, et al. Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2010, 12:5 − 14.
    [11] PYBURN R. Towards best practices for group certification[R]. ISEAL Alliance, 2005: 53.
    [12] FSC森林经营联合认证标准: FSC-STD-30-005 V1-0[EB/OL]. (2016-11-16)[2021-04-27]. https://cn.fsc.org/preview.fsc-std-30-005v1-0.a-177.pdf.
    [13] KLINGBERG T. Certification of forestry: a small-scale forester perspective[J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2003, 2:409 − 421. doi: 10.1007/s11842-003-0028-0
    [14] AUER M R. Group forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects[J]. Human Ecology, 2012, 40(1):5 − 14. doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9451-6
    [15] CHEN J, INNES J L. The implications of new forest tenure reforms and forestry property markets for sustainable forest management and forest certification in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129:206 − 215.
    [16] PINTO L F G, GARDNER T, MCDERMOTT C L, et al. Group certification supports an increase in the diversity of sustainable agriculture network–rainforest alliance certified coffee producers in Brazil[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 107:59 − 64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.006
    [17] ZOBEL T. The ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ of joint EMS and group certification: a swedish case study[J]. Responsible Environmental Management, 2007, 14:152 − 166.
    [18] LATYNSKIY E, BERGER T. Assessing the income effects of group certification for smallholder coffee farmers: agent‐based simulation in Uganda[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2017, 68(3):727 − 748. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12212
    [19] FSC森林经营联合认证标准: FSC-STD-30-005 V2-0[EB/OL]. (2021-03-18)[2021-04-27]. https://cn.fsc.org/preview.fsc-std-30-005-v2-0.a-287.pdf.
    [20] RAMETSTEINER E, SIMULA M. Forest certification: an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2003, 67:87 − 98.
    [21] MARK R, CHRISTINE O. More than markets: assessing Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification as a policy tool[J]. Journal of Forestry, 2006, 104(3):143 − 147.
    [22] FSC 中国国家森林管理标准[EB/OL]. (2018-03-08)[2021-04-27]. https://cn.fsc.org/preview.fsc-std-chn-01-2016-cn.a-243.pdf.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  41
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-04-29
  • 修回日期:  2021-08-18
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-09-01
  • 刊出日期:  2021-11-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回