• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵双效期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(核心库)来源期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

林木重要性状的杂种优势和遗传方式以及杂优预测的可能性

齐明 骆文坚 何贵平

齐明, 骆文坚, 何贵平. 林木重要性状的杂种优势和遗传方式以及杂优预测的可能性[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(2): 75-80.
引用本文: 齐明, 骆文坚, 何贵平. 林木重要性状的杂种优势和遗传方式以及杂优预测的可能性[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(2): 75-80.
Ming Qi, Wenjian Luo, Guiping He. Heterosis, Genetic Control Mode of Important Traits and Possibility about Heterosis Prediction in Forest Trees[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 23(2): 75-80.
Citation: Ming Qi, Wenjian Luo, Guiping He. Heterosis, Genetic Control Mode of Important Traits and Possibility about Heterosis Prediction in Forest Trees[J]. WORLD FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 23(2): 75-80.

林木重要性状的杂种优势和遗传方式以及杂优预测的可能性

基金项目: 

浙江省林业厅与中国林科院合作项目 2007SY09

浙江省科技厅项目 2008C02004-2

详细信息
    作者简介:

    齐明(1962-), 男, 湖北新洲人, 硕士、副研究员, 主要从事林木遗传改良研究

  • 中图分类号: S718.46

Heterosis, Genetic Control Mode of Important Traits and Possibility about Heterosis Prediction in Forest Trees

  • 摘要: 林木杂交育种成功的先决条件, 取决于杂种具有的正向杂种优势是否明显, 因此林木杂种优势的机理研究十分重要。一般来讲, 林木重要性状的杂种优势产生的机理应和该性状的遗传控制方式一致, 但是林木重要性状的遗传控制方式取决于交配群体的遗传结构, 并和多种因素有关, 因而不应随便地根据几个随机亲本的配合力分析结果, 就断然肯定该树种杂交是否有前途。与以往更多地重视种间杂交的观点不同, 文中认为林木的种内杂交在林木多性状改良中也有着巨大的潜力, 并将发挥重要作用。最后根据林木杂种优势与配合力间的联系, 就其对林木杂优预测的影响提出了笔者的认识。
  • 表  1  国内外部分阔叶树和针叶树生长性状的遗传测定结果

  • [1] 吴中贤, 张文灿.利用杂种性能估计杂种优势率的新方法[J].遗传, 1983, 5(4): 23-24. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000003526358
    [2] 周庭波.自花授粉作物杂种优势数学模型的探讨[J].遗传学报, 1982, 9(4): 289-297.
    [3] L Mejnartowin. Evidence for long-term heterosis phenomenon in the Alnusincana × A. glutinosa F1 hybrids[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1999, 48(2): 100-106.
    [4] 周志春, 金国庆.马尾松纸浆材重要经济性状配合力和杂种优势分析[J].林业科学, 2004, 40(4): 52-57. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2004.04.009
    [5] 金国庆, 秦国峰, 周志春.马尾松生长性状交配效应的遗传分析及杂交组合选择[J].林业科学, 2008, 44(6): 28-33. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.06.006
    [6] 王章荣.鹅掌揪属杂交育种成就与育种策略[J].林业科技开发, 2008(5): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2008.05.001
    [7] T La Farge, J F Kraus. A progeny test of(shortleaf × loblolly)×loblolly hybrids to produce rapid-growing hybrids resistant to F. Rust[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1980, 29(5/6): 197-200.
    [8] B S Baltunis, M S Greenwood, T Eysteinsson. Hybrid vigor in Larix: growth of intra-and inter specific hybrids of Larix decidua, C. Lariciuna and L. kaempferi after 5-years[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1998, 47(5/6): 288-294.
    [9] S B Bolstad, H kang, R P Guries. Performance of inter-and intraprovenece crosses of Jack pine[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1991, 40(3/4): 124-130.
    [10] S Magnussen, C W Yeatman. Provenance hybrids in Jack pine: 15-year results in Easter Canada[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1988, 37(5/6): 206-217.
    [11] Ying C C. height growth of interprovenance cross in white spruce[J]. Silvae Genetca, 1978, 27: 226-229.
    [12] A Harfouche, A Kremer. Provenance hybridization in adiallel mating scheme of maritime pine Ⅰ: means and variance components[J]. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1139/x99-178
    [13] A Harfouche, Nasser Bahrman, et al. Provenance hybridization in adiallel mating scheme pine(Pinus pinaster)Ⅱ: herterosis[J]. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(1): 10-16. doi: 10.1139/x99-179
    [14] A D Yanchak. General and specific combining ability from disconnected partial diallel of coastal Dougas-fir[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1996, 45(1): 37-45.
    [15] J N King, M J Carson. Analysis of disconnected diallel mating designs Ⅱ: results from a third generation progeny test of New Zealand Radiata pine improvemenet programme[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1998, 47(2/3): 80-90.
    [16] 齐明.杉木育种中GCA与SCA的相对重要性[J].林业科学研究, 1996, 9(5): 498-503. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.1996.05.010
    [17] 齐明, 彭九生, 何贵平.关于杉木双列杂交试验若干问题的探讨[J].林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5): 724-728. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.05.024
    [18] 马育华.植物育种的数量遗传学基础[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社, 1982: 245-279.
    [19] B Li, R L Wu. Genetic causes of heterosis in juveneile aspen: a quantitative comparison across intra-and inter-specific hybrids[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93(3): 380-391. doi: 10.1007/BF00223180
    [20] B Li, R L Wu. Heterosis and genotype×environment interactions of juvenile aspen in two contrasting sites[J]. Can J For Res, 1997, 27(10): 1525-1527. doi: 10.1139-cjfr-27-10-1525/
    [21] J M Bouvet, P Vigeneron. Age trends in variance and heritabilities in Eucalyptus factorial mating designs[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1995, 44(4): 206-216. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=a29801597272cc30f4357eab7f1322f9
    [22] M J Dieters, T L White, G R Hodge. Genetic parameter estimates for volume from full-sib tests of slash pine[J]. Can J ForRes, 1995, 25(8): 1397-1408. doi: 10.1139/x95-152
    [23] F C Yeh, J C Heaman. Estimating genetic paramters of height growth in seven-year old coastal Dougas-fir from disconneted diallels[J]. Forest Science, 1987, 33(4): 946-957. http://europepmc.org/abstract/AGR/IND87088780
    [24] P P Cotterill, C A Dean, D Vanwyk. Additive, domiance genetic effects in Pinus pinaster, P. radiata and P. elliottii and some implications for breeding strategy[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1987, 36(5/6): 221-229.
    [25] E R Sluder. Results at age 15 years from a half-diallel cross among 10 Loblolly pines selected for resistence to fusiform rust(Cronartium quercuum.fsp. fusiforme)[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1993, 42(4/5): 223-230.
    [26] E R Sluder. Inheritance and gain in half-diallel cross among loblolly pines selected for resistance to fusiform rust[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1988, 37(1): 22-26.
    [27] G S Foster, F E Bridgwater. Geneticanalysis of fifth-year data from a seventeen parent partial diallel of loblolly pine[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1986, 35(2/3): 118-122. http://europepmc.org/abstract/AGR/IND86071913
    [28] I Blada. Juvenile Blister rust resistence and height growth of Pinus strobus × P. peuce F1 hybrids[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1989, 38(2): 45-49.
    [29] I Blada. Diallel Crossing in Pinus cembra Ⅲ: analysis of genetic variation at the nursery stage[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1999, 48(3/4): 179-187.
    [30] YAEl-kassaby, Y S Park. Genetic variation and correlation in growth, biomass and phenology of Dougas-fir diallel progeny at different spacings[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1993, 42(6): 289-296.
    [31] C J A Samuel. The estimation of genetic parameters for growth and stem-form over 15years in a diallel cross of sitka spruce[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1991, 42(2): 67-72.
    [32] Harfouche A, Baradat P, Kremer A. Variabilite intraspecifique chezle pinm aritime dansle sud-estdala France Ⅱ: Heterosis at combinaison de caracters chezdes hybrides in terraciaus[J]. Annals of For Sci, 1995, 52: 329-346. doi: 10.1051/forest:19950403
    [33] 齐明.杉木优良品种:龙15的同工酶分析[J].林业科学研究, 2007, 20(1): 143-146. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2007.01.028
    [34] 齐明.参试子代样本数对数量性状遗传分析结果的影响[J].林业科学研究, 1997, 10(6): 629-633. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199700791560
    [35] Pichot C, E Teissier du Cros. Estimation of genetic parameters in eastern cotton wood: consequence for the breeding strategy[J]. Ann Sci For, 1989, 46: 307-324. doi: 10.1051/forest:19890401
    [36] Sofi Parvez. Recent advance in understanding genetic basis of heterosis in rice(Oriza sativa L.)[J]. Revista UDO Agricola, 2006, 6(1): 1-10.
    [37] Jonathan Cornelius. Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees[J]. Can J For Res, 1994, 24(2): 372-379. doi: 10.1139/x94-050
    [38] 郑勇平, 孙鸿有, 冯建民.杉木优良无性系龙15与闽33双系种子园遗传改良效果分析[J].浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(2): 201-208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2009.02.009
    [39] 郑勇平, 孙鸿有, 董汝湘.杉木不同世代不同类型种子园遗传改良增益研究[J].林业科学, 2007, 43(3): 20-27. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx200703004
  • 加载中
表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  66
  • HTML全文浏览量:  11
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-06-11
  • 刊出日期:  2010-04-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回